What to know
- Our interpretation: assess drafting and review separately when evaluating a workflow.
How workers rated the changes
In Miro’s November 3 report, 73% of 9,502 respondents said AI improved the speed of their output. In the same question, 56% reported better output quality and 40% reported better collaboration. For collaboration, 47% reported no change and 13% reported a decline.
Miro, which sells collaboration software, ran the online survey in September and October 2026. Participants were offered a small incentive. The 11 geographic samples were split about evenly overall between individual contributors and people at director level or above. The report gives no sampling frame or weighting details. These percentages describe participants’ perceptions. The survey did not independently measure output or establish what caused changes.
Sources: Miro — The State of Intelligent Collaboration; Miro — Research launch
Our interpretation
Imagine a team testing AI on a recurring handoff. It could record the time to a first draft, the corrections a reviewer requests and the time until both sides agree the work is ready. Comparing those records across similar assignments would give the team three concrete things to discuss. This is an editorial suggestion that the survey did not test.
Sources & method
AI-generated synthesis of Figure 4 and the survey methods. The handoff exercise is original editorial interpretation.
- The State of Intelligent Collaboration Miro ·
- Research launch Miro ·
Drafted and source-checked by Codex AI agents. Read our sourcing, illustration, and correction policy.
Explore the occupations
What could this mean for your work?
See task exposure and potential career moves for roles connected to this story.
